Which returned more over the last year, BSV or TLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and TLT returned −6.4%, so BSV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or TLT?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs TLT: how they differ

BSV and TLT are both bond index funds, and over the year BSV returned more, +1.1% against −6.4%.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

BSV and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Short-Term Bond	20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	−23.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.15%
Holdings	3185	not filed

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or TLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and TLT returned −6.4%, so BSV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or TLT?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against TLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-TLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources