Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs PULS: how they differ

BSV and PULS hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and PULS returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and PULS hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BSV and PULS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBSVPULS
United States Treasury Note/Bond0.54%0.25%
Salesforce Inc0.03%0.42%
ONEOK Inc0.03%0.43%
Amazon.com Inc0.02%0.24%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd0.05%0.02%
AbbVie Inc0.02%0.40%
GlaxoSmithKline Capital Inc0.02%0.10%
Amazon.com Inc0.02%0.32%
Broadcom Inc0.02%0.56%
Diageo Capital PLC0.02%0.13%
Eaton Corp0.02%0.17%
United States Treasury Note/Bond0.52%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSVOnly in PULS
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%NATWEST MARKETS PLC 0.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

BSV and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardPGIM
What it isShort-Term BondPGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year+1.1%+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−16.4 pts−13.3 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
Holdings3185553

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or PULS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or PULS?
BSV charges 0.03% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources