Which returned more over the last year, BSV or NOBL?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or NOBL?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs NOBL: how they differ

BSV and NOBL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NOBL returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in NOBL
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	Nucor Corp. 1.77%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	International Business Machines Corp. 1.71%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

BSV and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	ProShares
What it is	Short-Term Bond	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+9.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	−8.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.35%
Holdings	3185	69

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or NOBL?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or NOBL?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against NOBL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources