Which returned more over the last year, BSV or MTUM?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or MTUM?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs MTUM: how they differ

BSV and MTUM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in MTUM
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.57%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	BROADCOM INC. 5.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.65%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.04%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	INTEL CORPORATION 3.84%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.76%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.62%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.44%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

BSV and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Short-Term Bond	MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+21.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	+4.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.15%
Holdings	3185	125

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or MTUM?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or MTUM?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against MTUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against MTUM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-MTUM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources