Which returned more over the last year, BSV or MGK?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and MGK returned +14.9%, so MGK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or MGK?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and MGK charges 0.07%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs MGK: how they differ

BSV and MGK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MGK returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and MGK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in MGK
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	NVIDIA Corp 13.29%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	Apple Inc 12.19%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	Microsoft Corp 7.52%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	Alphabet Inc 5.93%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Alphabet Inc 4.67%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Amazon.com Inc 4.47%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	Broadcom Inc 4.28%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	Meta Platforms Inc 4.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BSV and MGK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Vanguard
What it is	Short-Term Bond	Mega Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+14.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	−2.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.07%
Holdings	3185	56

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

MGK in plain words

MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or MGK?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and MGK returned +14.9%, so MGK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or MGK?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and MGK charges 0.07%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against MGK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against MGK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-MGK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources