Which returned more over the last year, BSV or IWM?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and IWM returned +21.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or IWM?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs IWM: how they differ

BSV and IWM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and IWM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in IWM
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	Moog, Inc. 0.38%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	Hut 8 Corp. 0.37%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	Viasat, Inc. 0.35%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.35%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.35%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	MaxLinear, Inc. 0.34%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	Argan, Inc. 0.34%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	UMB Financial Corp. 0.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BSV and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Short-Term Bond	Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+21.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	+3.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.19%
Holdings	3185	2014

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or IWM?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and IWM returned +21.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or IWM?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against IWM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against IWM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-IWM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources