Which returned more over the last year, BSV or IGM?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or IGM?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs IGM: how they differ

BSV and IGM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and IGM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in IGM
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	NVIDIA Corp. 7.97%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	Apple, Inc. 7.92%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	Broadcom, Inc. 7.61%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	Microsoft Corp. 7.50%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Alphabet, Inc. 4.45%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.17%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BSV and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Short-Term Bond	Expanded Tech Sector
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+32.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	+15.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.37%
Holdings	3185	295

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or IGM?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or IGM?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against IGM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against IGM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-IGM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources