Which returned more over the last year, BSV or CTA?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and CTA returned +17.0%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or CTA?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and CTA charges 0.75%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs CTA: how they differ

BSV and CTA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CTA returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and CTA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in CTA
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BSV and CTA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Simplify
What it is	Short-Term Bond	Simplify Managed Futures Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+17.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	−0.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.75%
Holdings	3185	10

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

CTA in plain words

CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or CTA?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and CTA returned +17.0%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or CTA?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and CTA charges 0.75%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against CTA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against CTA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-CTA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources