Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BOXX vs SGOV: how they differ
BOXX and SGOV are both short-term Treasury funds, and over the year they finished level, +4.0% against +3.8%.
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF.
| BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Alpha | iShares |
| What it is | 1-3 Month Box | 0-3 month T-bills |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +3.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.5 pts | −13.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.09% |
BOXX in plain words
BOXX is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 Month Box. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year.
SGOV in plain words
SGOV is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BOXX or SGOV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOXX returned +4.0% and SGOV returned +3.8%, so BOXX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BOXX or SGOV?
- BOXX charges 0.19% a year and SGOV charges 0.09%, so SGOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOXX against SGOV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOXX-SGOV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources