Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BOXX vs PULS: how they differ
BOXX and PULS are both short-term Treasury funds, and over the year they finished level, +4.0% against +4.2%.
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
| BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Alpha | PGIM |
| What it is | 1-3 Month Box | PGIM Ultra Short Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +4.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.5 pts | −13.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | not filed | 553 |
BOXX in plain words
BOXX is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 Month Box. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year.
PULS in plain words
PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BOXX or PULS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOXX returned +4.0% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BOXX or PULS?
- BOXX charges 0.19% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOXX against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOXX-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources