Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs XLK: how they differ

BOND and XLK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BONDOnly in XLK
UMBS, TBA 4.80%NVIDIA Corp 14.66%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%Apple Inc 12.86%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%Microsoft Corp 8.38%
United States Treasury 2.93%Micron Technology Inc 5.42%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%Broadcom Inc 5.41%
United States Treasury 2.22%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.28%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%Intel Corp 3.68%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%Applied Materials Inc 3.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BOND and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPIMCOState Street
What it isActive Bond Exchange-TradedTechnology
Total return, 1 year−0.1%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−17.6 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.54%0.08%
Holdings156574

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or XLK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or XLK?
BOND charges 0.54% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources