Which returned more over the last year, BOND or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and MUB returned +0.1%, so MUB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or MUB?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs MUB: how they differ

BOND and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in MUB
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
United States Treasury 2.93%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
United States Treasury 2.22%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

BOND and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	iShares
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.05%
Holdings	1565	6603

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and MUB returned +0.1%, so MUB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or MUB?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources