Which returned more over the last year, BOND or MAGS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or MAGS?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs MAGS: how they differ

BOND and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in MAGS
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	TREASURY BILL 65.41%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	NVIDIA Corp 4.15%
United States Treasury 2.93%	Apple Inc 4.12%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	Amazon.com Inc 4.11%
United States Treasury 2.22%	Tesla Inc 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	Microsoft Corp 3.62%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BOND and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	Roundhill
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	Magnificent Seven
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+14.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	−3.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.30%
Holdings	1565	9

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or MAGS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or MAGS?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against MAGS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources