Which returned more over the last year, BOND or LQD?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and LQD returned −2.7%, so BOND returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or LQD?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs LQD: how they differ

BOND and LQD are both bond index funds, and over the year BOND returned more, −0.1% against −2.7%.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

BOND and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	iShares
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.14%
Holdings	1565	not filed

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or LQD?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and LQD returned −2.7%, so BOND returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or LQD?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against LQD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-LQD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources