Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FXI?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and FXI returned −13.8%, so BOND returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or FXI?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so BOND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs FXI: how they differ

BOND and FXI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BOND returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in FXI
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72%
United States Treasury 2.93%	INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41%
United States Treasury 2.22%	MEITUAN 4.79%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

BOND and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	iShares
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	China Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	−13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	−31.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.73%
Holdings	1565	52

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FXI?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and FXI returned −13.8%, so BOND returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or FXI?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so BOND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against FXI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against FXI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-FXI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources