Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs EMB: how they differ

BOND and EMB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and EMB returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and EMB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BOND and EMB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBONDEMB
Brazil Government International Bonds0.09%0.18%
Mexico Government International Bonds0.07%0.18%
PETROLEOS MEXICANOS0.05%0.29%
Mexico Government International Bonds0.05%0.12%
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA0.02%0.22%
COSTA RICA GOVERNMENT0.02%0.22%
Mexico Government International Bonds0.02%0.07%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BONDOnly in EMB
UMBS, TBA 4.80%Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%
United States Treasury 2.93%Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%
United States Treasury 2.22%EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

BOND and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPIMCOiShares
What it isActive Bond Exchange-TradedJ.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond
Total return, 1 year−0.1%+2.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−17.6 pts−14.7 pts
Expense ratio0.54%0.39%
Holdings1565681

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or EMB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and EMB returned +2.8%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or EMB?
BOND charges 0.54% a year and EMB charges 0.39%, so EMB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against EMB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against EMB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-EMB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources