Get alerts

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

BND vs IVV

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

BND and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssuerVanguardiShares
What it isUS aggregate bondsS&P 500
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+20.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−18.7 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.03%
Holdingsn/a504

BND in plain words

BND is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

IVV in plain words

IVV is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or IVV?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +1.3% and IVV returned +20.1%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BND or IVV?
BND charges 0.03% a year and IVV charges 0.03%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against IVV, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BND-IVV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources