Which returned more over the last year, BIL or REMX?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and REMX returned +21.9%, so REMX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BIL or REMX?

BIL charges 0.14% a year and REMX charges 0.53%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are BIL and REMX the same kind of fund?

No. BIL is an index ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BIL vs REMX: how they differ

Over the year REMX returned more, +21.9% against +3.7%, and BIL charges 0.14% against 0.53%.

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.

BIL and REMX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Thematic ETF
Issuer	State Street	VanEck
What it is	1-3 month T-bills	Miners and metals
Total return, 1 year	+3.7%	+21.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.8 pts	+4.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.53%
Holdings	not filed	30

BIL in plain words

BIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

REMX in plain words

By weight, 7% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.4 pts. It sits 67.6% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BIL or REMX?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and REMX returned +21.9%, so REMX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BIL or REMX?: BIL charges 0.14% a year and REMX charges 0.53%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are BIL and REMX the same kind of fund?: No. BIL is an index ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIL against REMX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against REMX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BIL-REMX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources