Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BIL vs IUSB: how they differ
BIL is a short-term Treasury fund and IUSB a bond index fund, and over the year BIL returned more, +3.7% against −0.3%.
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.
| BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | iShares |
| What it is | 1-3 month T-bills | Core Universal USD Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | −0.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.8 pts | −17.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | not filed | 17819 |
BIL in plain words
BIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
IUSB in plain words
IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BIL or IUSB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so BIL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BIL or IUSB?
- BIL charges 0.14% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against IUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BIL-IUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources