Which returned more over the last year, BIL or EWT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BIL or EWT?

BIL charges 0.14% a year and EWT charges 0.59%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BIL vs EWT: how they differ

BIL is a short-term Treasury fund and EWT an equity index fund, and over the year EWT returned more, +84.9% against +3.7%.

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.

BIL and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	State Street	iShares
What it is	1-3 month T-bills	MSCI Taiwan
Total return, 1 year	+3.7%	+84.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.8 pts	+67.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.59%
Holdings	not filed	85

BIL in plain words

BIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BIL or EWT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BIL or EWT?: BIL charges 0.14% a year and EWT charges 0.59%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIL against EWT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against EWT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BIL-EWT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources