Which is cheaper, BAPR or IVV?

BAPR charges 0.79% a year and IVV charges 0.03%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are BAPR and IVV the same kind of fund?

No. BAPR is a buffer ETF and IVV is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BAPR vs IVV: how they differ

BAPR and IVV are measured over different days, and IVV charges 0.03% against 0.79%.

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Apr and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

BAPR and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Apr	IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits	Buffer ETF	Core index fund
Issuer	Innovator	iShares
What it is	Defined outcome, 9% on SPY	S&P 500
Total return, 1 year	not published	+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	not published	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	not available	+0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.79%	0.03%
Holdings	not filed	504

BAPR in plain words

From its price on Sep 12, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 10.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 14.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 201 days remained on Sep 12, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, BAPR or IVV?: BAPR charges 0.79% a year and IVV charges 0.03%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are BAPR and IVV the same kind of fund?: No. BAPR is a buffer ETF and IVV is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BAPR against IVV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BAPR against IVV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BAPR-IVV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources