Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs VT: how they differ

AVUV and VT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and AVUV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and VT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVVT
Mueller Industries Inc0.07%0.01%
Five Below Inc0.72%0.01%
Ryder System Inc0.60%0.01%
Sanmina Corp0.06%0.01%
UMB Financial Corp0.06%0.01%
Chord Energy Corp0.41%0.01%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.04%0.01%
Columbia Banking System Inc0.40%0.01%
Primoris Services Corp0.14%0.01%
Voya Financial Inc0.06%0.01%
Zions Bancorp NA0.05%0.01%
Associated Banc-Corp0.33%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in VT
SkyWest Inc 0.60%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
United Natural Foods Inc 0.58%Apple Inc 3.53%
Kodiak Gas Services Inc 0.56%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
International Seaways Inc 0.51%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.48%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
Tutor Perini Corp 0.46%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
Allegiant Travel Co 0.40%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Argan Inc 0.36%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUV and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanguard
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%55.2%
Holdings79510042

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and VT returned +18.9%, so AVUV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or VT?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources