Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs VONG: how they differ

AVUV and VONG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AVUV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and VONG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVVONG
Sprouts Farmers Market Inc0.02%0.02%
Paycom Software Inc0.10%0.01%
Alaska Air Group Inc0.64%0.00%
Lyft Inc0.26%0.00%
Lithia Motors Inc0.29%0.00%
SLM Corp0.46%0.00%
Credit Acceptance Corp0.20%0.00%
Eagle Materials Inc0.03%0.00%
Iridium Communications Inc0.71%0.00%
Kyndryl Holdings Inc0.00%0.00%
Liberty Capital Corp0.01%0.00%
Liberty Capital Corp0.11%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in VONG
Viasat Inc 1.39%NVIDIA Corp 13.09%
Matson Inc 0.98%Apple Inc 11.97%
Lear Corp 0.90%Microsoft Corp 8.98%
SM Energy Co 0.86%Broadcom Inc 5.78%
Avnet Inc 0.86%Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Macy's Inc 0.78%Alphabet Inc 3.91%
StoneX Group Inc 0.77%Tesla Inc 3.48%
Five Below Inc 0.72%Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVUV and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanguard
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%95.6%
Holdings795387

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and VONG returned +7.2%, so AVUV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or VONG?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources