Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs VGT: how they differ

AVUV and VGT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and VGT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and VGT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVVGT
Viasat Inc1.39%0.10%
Avnet Inc0.86%0.09%
Plexus Corp0.69%0.09%
Vishay Intertechnology Inc0.64%0.09%
SolarEdge Technologies Inc0.27%0.07%
Sanmina Corp0.06%0.13%
Benchmark Electronics Inc0.46%0.04%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.04%0.11%
Penguin Solutions Inc0.14%0.04%
Vistance Networks Inc0.05%0.04%
ePlus Inc0.22%0.03%
Alarm.com Holdings Inc0.09%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in VGT
Matson Inc 0.98%NVIDIA Corp 16.85%
Lear Corp 0.90%Apple Inc 14.59%
SM Energy Co 0.86%Microsoft Corp 9.47%
Macy's Inc 0.78%Broadcom Inc 4.21%
StoneX Group Inc 0.77%Micron Technology Inc 4.21%
Five Below Inc 0.72%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21%
Iridium Communications Inc 0.71%Intel Corp 2.03%
Cabot Corp 0.71%Cisco Systems Inc 1.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVUV and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanguard
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueInformation technology
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+35.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts+17.9 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.09%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%86.9%
Holdings795317

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or VGT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or VGT?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources