Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs SCHD: how they differ

AVUV and SCHD hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and SCHD hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and SCHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVSCHD
Columbia Banking System Inc0.40%0.22%
Macy's Inc0.78%0.15%
Bank OZK0.55%0.13%
Murphy Oil Corp0.57%0.12%
Banner Corp0.15%0.06%
OFG Bancorp0.23%0.05%
Korn Ferry0.04%0.09%
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corp0.19%0.04%
S&T Bancorp Inc0.09%0.04%
Buckle Inc/The0.19%0.04%
1st Source Corp0.11%0.03%
Lakeland Financial Corp0.03%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in SCHD
Viasat Inc 1.39%QUALCOMM Inc 6.75%
Matson Inc 0.98%Texas Instruments Inc 5.92%
Lear Corp 0.90%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10%
SM Energy Co 0.86%Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96%
Avnet Inc 0.86%Merck & Co Inc 3.87%
StoneX Group Inc 0.77%Chevron Corp 3.84%
Five Below Inc 0.72%Verizon Communications Inc 3.66%
Iridium Communications Inc 0.71%Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVUV and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisSchwab
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueUS dividend
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+27.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts+10.1 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%95.1%
Holdings79599

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or SCHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and SCHD returned +27.6%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or SCHD?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and SCHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 95% of SCHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against SCHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against SCHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-SCHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources