Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs IWM: how they differ

AVUV and IWM hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and AVUV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and IWM hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and IWM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVIWM
Viasat Inc1.39%0.35%
Argan Inc0.36%0.34%
StoneX Group Inc0.77%0.27%
Terex Corp0.39%0.26%
Plexus Corp0.69%0.25%
MYR Group Inc0.32%0.24%
Kodiak Gas Services Inc0.56%0.23%
Lantheus Holdings Inc0.70%0.23%
Valley National Bancorp0.27%0.22%
Archrock Inc0.61%0.22%
Granite Construction Inc0.31%0.22%
Oscar Health Inc0.53%0.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in IWM
Lear Corp 0.90%Moog, Inc. 0.38%
Avnet Inc 0.86%Hut 8 Corp. 0.37%
Macy's Inc 0.78%BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.35%
Five Below Inc 0.72%Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.35%
Iridium Communications Inc 0.71%MaxLinear, Inc. 0.34%
Alaska Air Group Inc 0.64%JFrog Ltd. 0.31%
Ryder System Inc 0.60%Riot Platforms, Inc. 0.30%
NOV Inc 0.58%Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUV and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueRussell 2000
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+21.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts+3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.19%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings7952014

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or IWM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and IWM returned +21.2%, so AVUV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or IWM?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and IWM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 0% of IWM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against IWM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against IWM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-IWM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources