Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs IJS: how they differ

AVUV and IJS hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and AVUV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and IJS hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and IJS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVIJS
SM Energy Co0.86%0.65%
Vishay Intertechnology Inc0.64%0.73%
Matson Inc0.98%0.64%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp0.64%0.52%
Plexus Corp0.69%0.49%
Rush Enterprises Inc0.59%0.49%
Bread Financial Holdings Inc0.48%0.48%
Liberty Energy Inc0.58%0.47%
California Resources Corp0.59%0.45%
CarMax Inc0.45%0.82%
Versant Media Group Inc0.42%0.56%
Telephone and Data Systems Inc0.55%0.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in IJS
Viasat Inc 1.39%MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30%
Lear Corp 0.90%MATCH GROUP INC 0.97%
Avnet Inc 0.86%EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84%
Macy's Inc 0.78%KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77%
StoneX Group Inc 0.77%POOL CORP 0.75%
Five Below Inc 0.72%LKQ CORP 0.73%
Cabot Corp 0.71%ENPHASE ENERGY INC 0.71%
Lantheus Holdings Inc 0.70%ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS INC 0.70%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUV and IJS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueS&P Small-Cap 600 Value
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+22.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.18%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings795461

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

IJS in plain words

IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or IJS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and IJS returned +22.1%, so AVUV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or IJS?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and IJS charges 0.18%, so IJS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and IJS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 0% of IJS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against IJS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against IJS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-IJS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources