Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs IGM: how they differ

AVUV and IGM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and IGM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and IGM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVIGM
Sanmina Corp0.06%0.06%
Viasat Inc1.39%0.05%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.04%0.05%
Plexus Corp0.69%0.04%
Avnet Inc0.86%0.03%
Vishay Intertechnology Inc0.64%0.03%
Benchmark Electronics Inc0.46%0.01%
Penguin Solutions Inc0.14%0.01%
SolarEdge Technologies Inc0.27%0.01%
Diebold Nixdorf Inc0.19%0.01%
Vistance Networks Inc0.05%0.01%
Cargurus Inc0.03%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in IGM
Matson Inc 0.98%NVIDIA Corp. 7.97%
Lear Corp 0.90%Apple, Inc. 7.92%
SM Energy Co 0.86%Broadcom, Inc. 7.61%
Macy's Inc 0.78%Microsoft Corp. 7.50%
StoneX Group Inc 0.77%Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47%
Five Below Inc 0.72%Alphabet, Inc. 4.45%
Iridium Communications Inc 0.71%Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.17%
Cabot Corp 0.71%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUV and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueExpanded Tech Sector
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+32.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts+15.2 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.37%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%92.0%
Holdings795295

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or IGM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or IGM?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so AVUV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and IGM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 92% of IGM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against IGM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against IGM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-IGM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources