Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs DFUS: how they differ

AVUV and DFUS hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and AVUV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and DFUS hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and DFUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVDFUS
Mueller Industries Inc0.07%0.02%
Five Below Inc0.72%0.02%
Vistance Networks Inc0.05%0.02%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.04%0.01%
Primoris Services Corp0.14%0.01%
Ryder System Inc0.60%0.01%
UMB Financial Corp0.06%0.01%
Zions Bancorp NA0.05%0.01%
Argan Inc0.36%0.01%
Chord Energy Corp0.41%0.01%
Columbia Banking System Inc0.40%0.01%
Kirby Corp0.40%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in DFUS
Boyd Gaming Corp 0.25%NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%
SkyWater Technology Inc 0.20%APPLE INC. 5.86%
Super Group SGHC Ltd 0.20%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%
Kimbell Royalty Partners LP 0.15%AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%
SunCoke Energy Inc 0.12%ALPHABET INC. 3.31%
Slide Insurance Holdings Inc 0.12%BROADCOM INC. 2.90%
Clarivate PLC 0.11%ALPHABET INC. 2.74%
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc 0.11%META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUV and DFUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisDimensional
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueU.S. Equity Market
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.09%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%90.2%
Holdings7952231

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or DFUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and DFUS returned +17.5%, so AVUV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or DFUS?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and DFUS charges 0.09%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and DFUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 90% of DFUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against DFUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against DFUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-DFUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources