Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs XLP: how they differ

AVUS and XLP hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and XLP hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSXLP
Costco Wholesale Corp0.69%9.06%
Walmart Inc0.64%10.84%
Procter & Gamble Co/The0.28%7.46%
Target Corp0.25%3.87%
Coca-Cola Co/The0.23%6.87%
PepsiCo Inc0.21%4.34%
Kroger Co/The0.16%2.05%
Colgate-Palmolive Co0.13%4.71%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co0.12%2.40%
Dollar General Corp0.11%1.65%
Dollar Tree Inc0.11%1.43%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.10%1.91%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in XLP
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%Philip Morris International Inc 6.16%
Apple Inc 5.37%Altria Group Inc 4.55%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%General Mills Inc 1.21%
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%Bunge Global SA 0.94%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%McCormick & Co Inc/MD 0.83%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%J M Smucker Co/The 0.78%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%Clorox Co/The 0.75%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. EquityConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%100.0%
Holdings187534

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or XLP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and XLP returned +6.3%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or XLP?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources