Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs XLB: how they differ

AVUS and XLB hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and XLB hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and XLB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSXLB
Freeport-McMoRan Inc0.26%5.31%
Nucor Corp0.18%3.88%
Air Products and Chemicals Inc0.13%4.63%
Steel Dynamics Inc0.13%3.73%
Newmont Corp0.10%5.85%
CF Industries Holdings Inc0.09%2.23%
Corteva Inc0.09%4.97%
Packaging Corp of America0.09%2.83%
Sherwin-Williams Co/The0.09%4.95%
Martin Marietta Materials Inc0.06%4.55%
Vulcan Materials Co0.06%4.72%
International Paper Co0.05%2.70%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in XLB
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%Linde PLC 14.08%
Apple Inc 5.37%CRH PLC 4.67%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%Smurfit Westrock PLC 3.25%
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%Amcor PLC 2.69%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%DuPont de Nemours Inc 2.48%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%LyondellBasell Industries NV 1.82%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
XLB
State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. EquityMaterials
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%100.0%
Holdings187526

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

XLB in plain words

XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or XLB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and XLB returned +12.0%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or XLB?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so XLB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against XLB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against XLB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-XLB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources