Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs XHB: how they differ

AVUS and XHB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and XHB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and XHB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSXHB
Home Depot Inc/The0.35%3.28%
Williams-Sonoma Inc0.12%3.34%
DR Horton Inc0.10%3.29%
PulteGroup Inc0.08%3.44%
Lowe's Cos Inc0.08%3.03%
NVR Inc0.07%3.21%
Owens Corning0.06%4.10%
Advanced Drainage Systems Inc0.05%3.60%
Toll Brothers Inc0.05%3.52%
Lennox International Inc0.05%3.37%
Carlisle Cos Inc0.04%3.28%
Lennar Corp0.03%2.99%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in XHB
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%Masco Corp 3.41%
Apple Inc 5.37%Somnigroup International Inc 3.40%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%Trane Technologies PLC 3.25%
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%Allegion plc 3.22%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%Carrier Global Corp 3.20%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%Johnson Controls International plc 3.11%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and XHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
XHB
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. EquitySPDR S&P Homebuilders
Total return, 1 year+21.6%−16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−34.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%45.7%
Holdings187535

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

XHB in plain words

XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or XHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and XHB returned −16.6%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or XHB?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so AVUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against XHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources