Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs VONG: how they differ

AVUS and VONG hold 46% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and VONG hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSVONG
NVIDIA Corp5.49%13.09%
Apple Inc5.37%11.97%
Microsoft Corp3.85%8.98%
Amazon.com Inc3.68%5.07%
Alphabet Inc2.42%3.91%
Meta Platforms Inc2.21%3.20%
Alphabet Inc1.94%3.15%
Broadcom Inc1.18%5.78%
Lam Research Corp1.00%1.21%
Eli Lilly & Co0.84%2.67%
Tesla Inc0.80%3.48%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.69%1.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in VONG
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%American Tower Corp 0.26%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.20%Spotify Technology SA 0.23%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.07%Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.12%
Merck & Co Inc 0.63%Axon Enterprise Inc 0.10%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.61%Natera Inc 0.09%
Johnson & Johnson 0.58%FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.08%
Intel Corp 0.58%Ares Management Corp 0.07%
Chevron Corp 0.54%Insmed Inc 0.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVUS and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanguard
What it isU.S. EquityRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%95.6%
Holdings1875387

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and VONG returned +7.2%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or VONG?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 46% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources