Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs VNQ: how they differ

AVUS and VNQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and VNQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and VNQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSVNQ
CBRE Group Inc0.07%2.26%
Jones Lang LaSalle Inc0.03%0.80%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc0.01%0.11%
CoStar Group Inc0.01%0.78%
Opendoor Technologies Inc0.01%0.26%
Newmark Group Inc0.00%0.13%
St Joe Co/The0.00%0.13%
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings Inc0.00%0.06%
Zillow Group Inc0.00%0.40%
Forestar Group Inc0.00%0.03%
Marcus & Millichap Inc0.00%0.04%
Zillow Group Inc0.00%0.11%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in VNQ
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund 14.67%
Apple Inc 5.37%Welltower Inc 7.86%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%Prologis Inc 7.02%
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%Equinix Inc 5.66%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%American Tower Corp 4.55%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%Digital Realty Trust Inc 3.67%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%Simon Property Group Inc 3.54%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%Realty Income Corp 3.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and VNQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanguard
What it isU.S. EquityUS real estate
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+5.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−11.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%63.3%
Holdings1875146

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

VNQ in plain words

VNQ is an index equity fund tracking the US real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 54.9%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or VNQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and VNQ returned +5.6%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or VNQ?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and VNQ charges 0.13%, so VNQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and VNQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 63% of VNQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against VNQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against VNQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-VNQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources