Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs RSP: how they differ

AVUS and RSP hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and RSP hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and RSP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSRSP
Intel Corp0.58%0.38%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc0.67%0.33%
Sandisk Corp/DE0.41%0.32%
Western Digital Corp0.34%0.31%
Texas Instruments Inc0.33%0.27%
QUALCOMM Inc0.41%0.26%
Comfort Systems USA Inc0.26%0.25%
GE Vernova Inc0.40%0.25%
Caterpillar Inc0.92%0.24%
Amazon.com Inc3.68%0.24%
Arista Networks Inc0.25%0.24%
Micron Technology Inc2.40%0.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in RSP
Flex Ltd 0.28%Microchip Technology Inc. 0.27%
Cheniere Energy Inc 0.20%Qnity Electronics, Inc. 0.23%
TechnipFMC PLC 0.16%Iron Mountain Inc. 0.23%
Carnival Corp Ltd 0.14%SBA Communications Corp. 0.23%
Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.14%Masco Corp. 0.22%
Nextpower Inc 0.13%Carrier Global Corp. 0.22%
MercadoLibre Inc 0.11%Coterra Energy Inc. 0.22%
ATI Inc 0.11%Invitation Homes Inc. 0.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisInvesco
What it isU.S. EquityS&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%99.1%
Holdings1875503

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or RSP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and RSP returned +14.8%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or RSP?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so AVUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against RSP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against RSP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-RSP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources