Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs MOAT: how they differ

AVUS and MOAT hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and MOAT hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and MOAT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSMOAT
NVIDIA Corp5.49%2.45%
Microsoft Corp3.85%2.20%
Amazon.com Inc3.68%1.33%
Broadcom Inc1.18%2.43%
Meta Platforms Inc2.21%1.17%
Applied Materials Inc0.68%2.34%
Charles Schwab Corp/The0.25%2.45%
Fortinet Inc0.23%2.21%
PepsiCo Inc0.21%1.17%
US Bancorp0.21%1.39%
Palo Alto Networks Inc0.18%2.51%
Walt Disney Co/The0.17%1.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in MOAT
Apple Inc 5.37%Masco Corp 2.96%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%GE HealthCare Technologies Inc 2.21%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%Clorox Co/The 2.21%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%Tyler Technologies Inc 2.15%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.20%Entegris Inc 1.73%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.07%NXP Semiconductors NV 1.60%
Lam Research Corp 1.00%McCormick & Co Inc/MD 1.29%
Caterpillar Inc 0.92%Guidewire Software Inc 1.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanEck
What it isU.S. EquityMorningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+11.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−6.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.46%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%91.6%
Holdings187555

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or MOAT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or MOAT?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so AVUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against MOAT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against MOAT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-MOAT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources