Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs IJT: how they differ

AVUS and IJT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and IJT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and IJT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSIJT
Viasat Inc0.08%1.35%
Argan Inc0.06%1.24%
Powell Industries Inc0.05%0.90%
Kodiak Gas Services Inc0.04%0.81%
StoneX Group Inc0.04%0.93%
Archrock Inc0.04%0.79%
Armstrong World Industries Inc0.04%0.76%
Primoris Services Corp0.04%0.60%
MYR Group Inc0.04%0.86%
Plexus Corp0.04%0.39%
Dana Inc0.03%0.16%
Granite Construction Inc0.03%0.77%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in IJT
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%Alkermes plc 0.97%
Apple Inc 5.37%Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. 0.92%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. 0.90%
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%TG Therapeutics, Inc. 0.80%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. 0.80%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%Etsy, Inc. 0.79%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%PTC Therapeutics, Inc. 0.75%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%Mercury Systems, Inc. 0.72%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and IJT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. EquityS&P Small-Cap 600 Growth
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%0.0%
Holdings1875347

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or IJT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and IJT returned +17.6%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or IJT?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so AVUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against IJT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against IJT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-IJT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources