Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs IJR: how they differ

AVUS and IJR hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and IJR hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and IJR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSIJR
Viasat Inc0.08%0.68%
Argan Inc0.06%0.62%
Powell Industries Inc0.05%0.45%
SM Energy Co0.05%0.33%
Jackson Financial Inc0.04%0.16%
Kodiak Gas Services Inc0.04%0.41%
StoneX Group Inc0.04%0.47%
Archrock Inc0.04%0.40%
Armstrong World Industries Inc0.04%0.38%
Primoris Services Corp0.04%0.30%
Liberty Energy Inc0.04%0.24%
MYR Group Inc0.04%0.43%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in IJR
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.61%
Apple Inc 5.37%MAXLINEAR INC 0.60%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%MATCH GROUP INC 0.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%ALKERMES PLC 0.48%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INC 0.46%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%RALLIANT CORP 0.46%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%GLAUKOS CORP 0.46%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES INC 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and IJR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. EquityS&P SmallCap 600
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+19.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts+2.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%0.0%
Holdings1875603

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or IJR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and IJR returned +19.9%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or IJR?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and IJR charges 0.06%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and IJR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 0% of IJR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against IJR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against IJR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-IJR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources