Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs DFUS: how they differ

AVUS and DFUS hold 75% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and DFUS hold 75% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and DFUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSDFUS
NVIDIA Corp5.49%6.97%
Apple Inc5.37%5.86%
Microsoft Corp3.85%4.52%
Amazon.com Inc3.68%3.84%
Alphabet Inc2.42%3.31%
Meta Platforms Inc2.21%2.01%
Alphabet Inc1.94%2.74%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.20%1.26%
Broadcom Inc1.18%2.90%
Exxon Mobil Corp1.07%0.97%
Micron Technology Inc2.40%0.89%
Eli Lilly & Co0.84%1.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in DFUS
Carnival Corp Ltd 0.14%Philip Morris International Inc. 0.39%
MercadoLibre Inc 0.11%Altria Group, Inc. 0.18%
Masimo Corp 0.04%SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY S.A. 0.10%
Strategy Inc 0.04%CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION 0.08%
Royalty Pharma PLC 0.04%MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED 0.08%
Viking Holdings Ltd 0.03%ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 0.07%
Boyd Gaming Corp 0.03%BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY 0.06%
Hess Midstream LP 0.02%NASDAQ, INC. 0.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and DFUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisDimensional
What it isU.S. EquityU.S. Equity Market
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%90.2%
Holdings18752231

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or DFUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and DFUS returned +17.5%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or DFUS?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and DFUS charges 0.09%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and DFUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 90% of DFUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 75% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against DFUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against DFUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-DFUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources