Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVEM vs IWF: how they differ

AVEM and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AVEM returned more over the year.

Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVEM and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVEM and IWF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVEMIWF
Anglogold Ashanti Plc0.45%0.11%
Coupang Inc0.02%0.06%
NU Holdings Ltd/Cayman Islands0.01%0.14%
Southern Copper Corp0.08%0.01%
Aura Minerals Inc0.01%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVEMOnly in IWF
SK hynix Inc 7.83%NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 6.33%APPLE INC. 6.72%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 5.70%ALPHABET INC. 6.18%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 4.11%BROADCOM INC. 5.21%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 1.51%ALPHABET INC. 4.98%
MediaTek Inc 1.11%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11%
China Construction Bank Corp 0.89%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.81%TESLA, INC. 3.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVEM and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isEmerging Markets EquityRussell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year+31.8%+7.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+14.3 pts−10.5 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.18%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%93.6%
Holdings3897368

AVEM in plain words

AVEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging Markets Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3897 positions, with the top ten at 29.9%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVEM or IWF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVEM returned +31.8% and IWF returned +7.0%, so AVEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVEM or IWF?
AVEM charges 0.33% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVEM and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVEM and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVEM against IWF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVEM against IWF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVEM-IWF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources