Which returned more over the last year, AOR or TLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and TLT returned −6.4%, so AOR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, AOR or TLT?

AOR charges 0.15% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AOR vs TLT: how they differ

AOR is an equity index fund and TLT a bond index fund, and over the year AOR returned more, +11.3% against −6.4%.

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

AOR and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation	20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	+11.3%	−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−6.2 pts	−23.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.15%
Holdings	7	not filed

AOR in plain words

AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or TLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and TLT returned −6.4%, so AOR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AOR or TLT?: AOR charges 0.15% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AOR against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against TLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-TLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources