Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AOR vs MTUM: how they differ

AOR and MTUM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AOROnly in MTUM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.57%
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09%BROADCOM INC. 5.41%
iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02%NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.65%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.04%
iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57%INTEL CORPORATION 3.84%
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.76%
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96%LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.62%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.44%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

AOR and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore 60/40 Balanced AllocationMSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+21.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts+4.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%98.2%
Holdings7125

AOR in plain words

AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or MTUM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AOR or MTUM?
AOR charges 0.15% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AOR and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AOR against MTUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against MTUM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-MTUM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources