Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AGG vs QQQM
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | Nasdaq-100 |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.3% | +25.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.6 pts | +5.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | n/a | 101 |
AGG in plain words
AGG is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
QQQM in plain words
QQQM is a index equity fund tracking Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +25.7% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or QQQM?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +1.3% and QQQM returned +25.7%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or QQQM?
- AGG charges 0.03% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against QQQM, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-QQQM.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources