Get alerts

Data as of . Returns from exchange end-of-day prices with distributions reinvested; holdings from the fund's latest SEC filing.

SGOV · iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF

Cash and Treasury bills · 0-3 month T-bills

SGOV is a cash and treasury bills tracking 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.

What it tracks0-3 month T-bills
Fund typeCash and Treasury bills
Expense ratio (prospectus XBRL)0.09%
Price$100.47
Listed sinceMay 28, 2020
3 months: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)+0.9% / +4.7% / −3.8 pts / −1.1 pts
6 months: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)+1.8% / +15.2% / −13.3 pts / −18.3 pts
1 year: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)+3.8% / +20.0% / −16.1 pts / −21.8 pts
3 years: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)+14.4% / +78.0% / −63.5 pts / −79.0 pts
since listing: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)+20.2% / +177.3% / −157.2 pts / −204.3 pts
Below its high (ETFIQ)+0.0%

Questions people ask

How has SGOV performed?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, SGOV returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500. Over three years the figure is +14.4%.
What does SGOV cost?
The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.
How far is SGOV below its high?
−0.0% below its high of Sep 4, 2026, measured on the reinvested series to Sep 4, 2026.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

Funds near this one

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SGOV, core index fund, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/SGOV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ covers buffer, option-income and thematic ETFs. This fund is here because the desks measure against it and portfolios hold it. ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Standards and sources