Has KGRO beaten the S&P 500?

Name: ETFIQ themes desk record for KGRO
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Holdings from the fund’s latest public SEC N-PORT filing; overlap and active share computed by ETFIQ against the IVV and QQQM books; returns from Tiingo end-of-day prices with distributions reinvested.

KGRO · KraneShares China Innovation ETF

KraneShares · Themes desk

Open the live card on ETFIQ

KGRO has no public holdings filing captured yet. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +0.0% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 20.0 pts. It sits 49.4% below its all-time high of Oct 25, 2021.

KGRO (KraneShares China Innovation ETF), themes desk fields as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Theme (ETFIQ, editorial)	Broad innovation and megatrends
Launched	Oct 7, 2021
3 months: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)	+0.0% / +4.7% / −4.7 pts / −2.1 pts
6 months: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)	+0.0% / +15.2% / −15.2 pts / −20.2 pts
1 year: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)	+0.0% / +20.0% / −20.0 pts / −25.6 pts
3 years: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)	−12.0% / +78.0% / −90.0 pts / −105.5 pts
since launch: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ)	−46.5% / +87.3% / −133.8 pts / −150.3 pts
Below its all-time high (ETFIQ)	−49.4%

Questions people ask

Has KGRO beaten the S&P 500?: Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 KGRO returned +0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so it finished behind the index by 20.0 points.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

Funds near this one

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KGRO on the themes desk, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/KGRO.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; sort orders and figures are stated arithmetic on published data. Standards · How to read this desk