Data as of . Holdings from the fund’s latest public SEC N-PORT filing; overlap and active share computed by ETFIQ against the IVV and QQQM books; returns from Tiingo end-of-day prices with distributions reinvested.
HAIL · State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
State Street · Themes desk
Open the live card on ETFIQBy weight, 17% of HAIL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 87 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 7.9 pts. It sits 42.4% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
| Theme (ETFIQ, editorial) | Electric vehicles and batteries |
|---|---|
| Launched | Dec 27, 2017 |
| Already in the S&P 500, by weight (ETFIQ) | 16.8% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 (ETFIQ) | 95.0% |
| Already in the Nasdaq-100, by weight (ETFIQ) | 6.9% |
| Active share vs the Nasdaq-100 (ETFIQ) | 94.4% |
| Top ten holdings weight | 17.3% |
| Holdings | 87 |
| Net assets (latest filing) | $22M |
| Holdings as of (SEC N-PORT) | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Top holdings | Allegro MicroSystems Inc 2.1%, Lucid Group Inc 2.0%, Ambarella Inc 1.9%, Aeva Technologies Inc 1.7%, Via Transportation Inc 1.7%, Rivian Automotive Inc 1.6%, Aspen Aerogels Inc 1.6%, indie Semiconductor Inc 1.6%, Cummins Inc 1.6%, Aurora Innovation Inc 1.6% |
| 3 months: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ) | −9.8% / +4.7% / −14.4 pts / −11.8 pts |
| 6 months: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ) | +9.9% / +15.2% / −5.2 pts / −10.2 pts |
| 1 year: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ) | +12.0% / +20.0% / −7.9 pts / −13.6 pts |
| 3 years: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ) | +19.4% / +78.0% / −58.6 pts / −74.1 pts |
| since launch: total return / S&P 500 / gap / Nasdaq-100 gap (ETFIQ) | +41.3% / +228.4% / −187.1 pts / −344.5 pts |
| Below its all-time high (ETFIQ) | −42.4% |
| Expense ratio (prospectus XBRL) | 0.45% |
| Fee for the part that differs from the S&P 500, active expense ratio (ETFIQ) | 0.47% |
| Closest funds by holdings overlap | FDRV 28%, DRIV 26%, WDRN 18%, CARZ 17%, PBW 16% |
Questions people ask
- How much of HAIL is already in the S&P 500?
- By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 17% of HAIL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Its active share against the index is 95%, so that share is the part doing something different.
- What does HAIL hold?
- 87 positions as filed for Jun 30, 2026, with the top ten at 17% of the fund. The largest are Allegro MicroSystems Inc at 2.1%, Lucid Group Inc at 2.0%, Ambarella Inc at 1.9%.
- Has HAIL beaten the S&P 500?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 HAIL returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so it finished behind the index by 7.9 points.
- What does HAIL cost?
- The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. Because 95% of the fund differs from the S&P 500, the fee on that differing part works out at 0.47%.
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Funds near this one
Put this on your own page
The difference bar for HAIL, redrawn every trading night. Free to use with the credit link; paste these two lines into any page or newsletter.
<a href="https://etfiq.com/funds/HAIL.html"><img src="https://etfiq.com/embed/themes/HAIL.svg" alt="HAIL difference bar, ETFIQ" width="640"></a>
<p><a href="https://etfiq.com/funds/HAIL.html">HAIL difference bar, updated daily by ETFIQ</a></p>Cite this page. ETFIQ, HAIL on the themes desk, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/HAIL.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; sort orders and figures are stated arithmetic on published data. Standards · How to read this desk