ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HACK · Amplify Cybersecurity ETF

HACK has not filed its holdings yet, so there is nothing to look through.

Amplify · Themes desk · data as of

n/aAlready in the S&P 500
n/aActive share vs the S&P 500
not publishedTop ten holdings
+32.9%Total return, 1 year

Period by period

HACK over each window to Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnS&P 500Gap to S&P 500Gap to Nasdaq-100
3 months+13.8%+4.7%+9.1 pts+11.7 pts
6 months+42.4%+15.2%+27.2 pts+22.2 pts
1 year+32.9%+20.0%+13.0 pts+7.3 pts
3 years+108.8%+78.0%+30.8 pts+15.3 pts
Since launch+360.8%+360.1%+0.7 pts−307.1 pts

In plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +32.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 13.0 pts. It sits 9.1% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.

HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF), themes desk fields as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Theme (ETFIQ, editorial)Cybersecurity
LaunchedNov 12, 2014
Net assets (SEC filing, whole fund, as filed for Jun 30, 2026)$2.6bn
Below its all-time high (ETFIQ)−9.1%

Holdings from the fund’s latest public SEC N-PORT filing; overlap and active share computed by ETFIQ against the IVV and QQQM books; returns from Tiingo end-of-day prices with distributions reinvested. How this desk computes every figure

Questions people ask

Has HACK beaten the S&P 500?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 HACK returned +32.9% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so it finished ahead of the index by 13.0 points.

The words on this page

Active share
The part of the fund doing something the index is not, as a percentage. It is the part a fee is actually buying.
Weight overlap
The share of money two portfolios hold in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice.
Already in the index
The fund’s weight in securities the S&P 500 holds at all. A fund can be made entirely of index names and still have high active share, because it holds them at very different weights.
Top ten
What the ten largest positions add up to. The higher it is, the more the fund is a bet on a few companies rather than a theme.

Every term this desk uses, defined in full on the themes desk vocabulary page.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

Funds near this one

HACK on the themes desk, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. ETFIQ is an independent publisher, is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and makes no recommendations.
Use this data, or open the live card

Open HACK on the live ETFIQ desk, where the figures update as the desk refreshes.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HACK on the themes desk, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/HACK.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How this desk computes every figure · Standards and sources