ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

SMH vs SOXQ

VanEck Semiconductor ETF and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

69% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SMH and SOXQ hold 69% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SMH and SOXQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSMHSOXQ
NVIDIA Corp17.56%8.99%
Micron Technology Inc5.68%11.84%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc5.63%6.49%
Broadcom Inc5.28%8.79%
Intel Corp5.15%6.33%
Marvell Technology Inc4.67%6.32%
QUALCOMM Inc3.74%4.44%
Texas Instruments Inc4.17%3.62%
Lam Research Corp5.32%3.42%
KLA Corp5.58%3.16%
Applied Materials Inc5.74%3.04%
Analog Devices Inc4.00%2.93%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SMHOnly in SOXQ
ASML Holding NV 5.04%NXP Semiconductors N.V. 3.00%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 2.15%ASML Holding N.V. 2.80%
Synopsys Inc 1.79%Coherent Corp. 2.50%
STMicroelectronics NV 1.26%GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. 1.64%
NXP Semiconductors NV 1.15%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. 1.51%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc 1.01%
Entegris, Inc. 0.78%
Nova Ltd. 0.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

SMH and SOXQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
SMHSOXQSMHSOXQSMHSOXQ
3 months−0.5%−4.0%−5.2 pts−8.7 pts−2.5 pts−6.1 pts
6 months+49.0%+56.3%+33.8 pts+41.2 pts+28.8 pts+36.2 pts
1 year+96.2%+107.9%+76.3 pts+87.9 pts+70.6 pts+82.3 pts
3 years+267.0%+225.0%+189.0 pts+147.0 pts+173.5 pts+131.5 pts
Since launch+5013.0%+282.6%+4201.6 pts+187.7 pts+3328.9 pts+165.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SMH and SOXQ on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
IssuerVanEckInvesco
ThemeSemiconductorsSemiconductors
In the S&P 50082.0%84.0%
Active share vs the S&P 50080.6%80.8%
In the Nasdaq-10085.9%81.7%
Holdings2530
Top ten, share of the fund70.3%63.4%
Expense ratio0.35%0.19%
Fee for the differing part0.43%0.24%
Total return, 1 year+96.2%+107.9%
vs the S&P 500+76.3 pts+87.9 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100+70.6 pts+82.3 pts
Below its high−15.2%−19.7%

SMH in plain words

By weight, 82% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 70% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +96.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 76.3 pts. It sits 15.2% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

SOXQ in plain words

By weight, 84% of SOXQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +107.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 87.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do SMH and SOXQ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 69% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is close to holding one of them twice. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, SMH or SOXQ?
SMH has 82% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SOXQ has 84%, so SOXQ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, SMH or SOXQ?
SMH charges 0.35% a year and SOXQ charges 0.19%, so SOXQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SMH against SOXQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SMH against SOXQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/SMH-SOXQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources