Get alerts

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

NASA vs PPA

Tema Space Innovators ETF and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

6% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NASA and PPA on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NASA
Tema Space Innovators ETF
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
IssuerTemaInvesco
ThemeSpaceDefense
In the S&P 5002.4%71.1%
Active share vs the S&P 500100.0%96.4%
In the Nasdaq-1000.0%7.3%
Holdings3760
Top ten, share of the fund60.8%55.5%
Expense ratio0.75%0.58%
Fee for the differing part0.75%0.60%
Total return, 1 year−6.6% (since launch on Mar 31, 2026)+12.6%
vs the S&P 500−25.3 pts−7.3 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−31.3 pts−13.0 pts
Below its high−43.9%−10.9%

NASA in plain words

By weight, 2% of NASA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 37 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −6.6% with distributions reinvested against +18.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 25.3 pts. It sits 43.9% below its all-time high of May 27, 2026.

PPA in plain words

By weight, 71% of PPA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 60 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 7.3 pts. It sits 10.9% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do NASA and PPA hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, NASA or PPA?
NASA has 2% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PPA has 71%, so NASA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NASA or PPA?
NASA charges 0.75% a year and PPA charges 0.58%, so PPA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NASA against PPA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/NASA-PPA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources