Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
KWEB vs SKYY
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF and First Trust Cloud Computing ETF, side by side on the themes desk.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | SKYY First Trust Cloud Computing ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | First Trust |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Cloud and software |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 38.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 86.5% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 7.9% | 19.9% |
| Holdings | 33 | 64 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.2% | 32.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.60% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | −27.2% | +26.4% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −47.2 pts | +6.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −52.8 pts | +0.9 pts |
| Below its high | −69.8% | −4.3% |
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
SKYY in plain words
By weight, 38% of SKYY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 64 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 6.5 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do KWEB and SKYY hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or SKYY?
- KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SKYY has 38%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, KWEB or SKYY?
- KWEB charges 0.69% a year and SKYY charges 0.60%, so SKYY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against SKYY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/KWEB-SKYY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources